Environment vs. Economy |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Environment vs. Economy |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
All right, so since I want to see a different topic out there...this one's from February's Lincoln-Douglas topic:
Resolved: A government's obligation to protect the environment ought to take precedence over its obligation to promote economic development. I'm on the negative side for this, seeing that only by providing a healthy, stable economy can you be able to help the environment. The products of a good economy are what help improve the environment. Haha don't worry...I have more points...I've researched both sides to this, so bring it on. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Dark Lord of McCandless ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,226 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,761 ![]() |
QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ May 20 2004, 6:46 PM) How is the economy not a public good? The better the economy, the wealthier everyone is and the higher the standard of living In economics, the definition of a "public good" is a Commons: something that everyone can extract resources from without having to put anything back, i.e. the environment. Nobody owns the environment. The economy is a private good because it's not free... you have to buy your way into it. You can OWN part of it. The economy might BENEFIT the whole public, but it is NOT a public good since it is ultimatley owned by private individuals. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |