god thread, number 3 |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
god thread, number 3 |
*disco infiltrator* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
So, it seems that everything talked about in another thread leads to religion.
So here we are! Debate the existence of God and which one's right and stuff. I would post links to God threads 1 & 2, but you can't search for three-letter words. ![]() (2 got to 50 pages, think we can beat it?!?) Er, I'll start. I'm atheist. Prove me wrong. By prove, I mean state facts that have been backed up by solid evidence. I have yet to see that happen in all 70 combined pages of threads 1 & 2. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,746 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 17,125 ![]() |
Science doesn't prove what we need to know. I hope someone has noticed that by now. I am a student of science, but I know it will not tell me what I want to know. It is possible that nothing will.
The unsolvable question is Why? For example, you may ask why trees move, and someone can answer because of the wind. Well, why is the wind there? Why is it blowing? Why did whatever blew it blow? Why can it blow? Why does it exist? Why does anything exist? Every time science answers one why, it leads to another question. It will never reach the last question, and thus never truly solves the first. Basically, we can find out how things happen with ease. Science however, cannot explain the why. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |