Environment vs. Economy |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Environment vs. Economy |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
All right, so since I want to see a different topic out there...this one's from February's Lincoln-Douglas topic:
Resolved: A government's obligation to protect the environment ought to take precedence over its obligation to promote economic development. I'm on the negative side for this, seeing that only by providing a healthy, stable economy can you be able to help the environment. The products of a good economy are what help improve the environment. Haha don't worry...I have more points...I've researched both sides to this, so bring it on. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Quand j'étais jeune... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 ![]() |
QUOTE(EmeraldKnight @ May 19 2004, 10:28 PM) unfortunately, capitalism revolves around being greedy pigs, and thus the environment suffers cuz if we were to apply regulations, our economy would suffer from inflation and we'd end up exporting from other countries that dont care as much It's all up to the tree huggers to make people 'aware'. Seriously speaking, it wouldn't be so bad though, if we were able to find a new fuel source; something to replace oil and coal. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |