Iran Options

[*CrackedRearView*]

PREFACE

CHRONOLOGY

Sept 2002: Work begins on Iran's first reactor at Bushehr.
Dec 2002: Satellites reveal Arak and Natanz sites triggering IAEA inspections.
Nov 2003: Iran suspends uranium enrichment and allows tougher inspections.
June 2004: IAEA rebukes Iran for not fully co-operating.
Nov 2004: Iran suspends enrichment under deal with EU.
Aug 2005: Iran rejects EU plan and re-opens Isfahan plant.
Jan 2006: Iran re-opens Natanz facility.

It is this final development that has me (and several million others worldwide) a little concerned. The Natanz enrichment plant was shut down by the UN in 2003 during strict inspections of the country.

Now, it appears that Seyyed Ali Khamene'i really, for lack of a better term, doesn't give a damn about what the United States or the rest of the industrialized thinks about his actions. PARADE Magazine published its annual "Top 10 Worst Dictators in the World" segment. As expected, Sudan's al-Bashir, North Korea's Kim Jong-il, and Burma/Myanmar's Than Shwe claimed the #1, 2, and 3 spots respectively. Ayatollah Khamene'i placed 9th, however, if he tears his country with him into a national war (which is quite possible) we might see him move on up the list.

So begs the question: "what do we do?"

I really don't see the Bush administration in a good light for this situation.

1) Their unilateralist attitudes scare me. More and more we see the effects of a dominant GOP failing to adhere to public opinion. And, despite how fickle it may be, the opinion of the electorate should always be considered over presidential zeal.

2) Their confidence is just too great. Condoleezza Rice is a perfect example of this. She was quoted as saying that Iran has "crossed the threshold," this says to me that there's no turning back. She's also quoted as saying that "Iran is in dangerous defiance of the international community." In short, she has called them out.

This is also the first time that we as a country see ourselves unprepared for a conflict. Bluntly, we don't have enough troops to stomach a war with a capable opponent like Iran. All roads would, therefore, lead to a draft if we declared war.

But it's a Catch-22 as well. Do we sit around and wait long enough for the EU to take action while the problem in Iran festers? Looks like we're stuck between Iraq and a hard place.

Curious, very curious...

[*disco infiltrator*]

Aren't they saying that they're only doing this so they can instate nuclear power in their country? Why can't they do that? Wouldn't it lead to more industrialization, thus making them more like us and Western Europe? Isn't that what we're aiming for?

[*CrackedRearView*]

Aren't they saying that they're only doing this so they can instate nuclear power in their country? Why can't they do that? Wouldn't it lead to more industrialization, thus making them more like us and Western Europe? Isn't that what we're aiming for?

Yes, the same way that nearly everyone would deny fault to any crime from a speeding ticket to murder one.

When you have people like Abdolreza Rahmani Fazli, deputy to Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani quoting "we have no reason to disarm or to be worried about international pressure," and people like Khamene'i whose goal in life is to wipe out Israel, it's hard to believe that Iran wants nuclear power when most industrialized nations aren't using it on a mass scale themselves...