Skin Standards? |
Skin Standards? |
Dec 24 2005, 11:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 52 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 307,384 |
Hi there!
First of all, I have to say that this is a kick-butt site. It's easy to navigate and use and a great source for skins. Secondly, I just wanted to voice a concern. I get confused sometimes by what standards the skins are being accepted under. It seems that what one mod would accept, another wouldn't. In the end, it's almost a matter of who you get reviewing your submission. So, I'm not complaining and in no way think that you guys hate me when I get rejected. :P It's just that I see such a broad spectrum of skins on here and see no line of standards, which makes it hard to understand what is considered good on the whole. Just a bit of feedback. Thanks again for a great site! |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jan 1 2006, 03:06 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() You'll find me in your dreams. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 8,536 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 114,010 |
I feel the need to reply to this topic. Blah. If I sound bitchy, forgive me.
---- Okay, when we reject a layout and you want to yell at us asking why there are two things I'd like you to remember. One, when there's 50 skins in the queue and 20 are Xanga I will not remember your layout. Okay? So show it to me and I'll tell you why I rejected it. Two, I follow this for the most part. Then I have a set of standards I personally follow when submitting a skin so I apply those to other people's skin's too. They are as follows. ---- - High quality, non-grainy image. A good sixth of the layouts I reject lack this. Even MS Paint can have good image quality. - Nice, readable text and hyperlinks. If I can't read it, then how can anyone else? - A fairly decent color scheme. Purple does not go with brown and there's too much contrast in red&black. - A decent sized image. A 900KB image isn't very practical. Your main image shouldn't go over 500KB usually. - A non-default layout. You can not stick in a background, change the colors, and call it a day. Simplistic is good, but a layout like that will take you five minutes, tops. That's on a Myspace level to me. (Not including the div overlays!) ---- If you think that's too much to ask for, then that's too bad. Really, all I look for is a skin that looks decent and that has effort put into it. Cross-browser compatibility would be nice too. |
|
|
|
Jan 3 2006, 08:31 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() sweet abandon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 194 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 131,225 |
QUOTE(fishcake-y @ Jan 1 2006, 6:06 PM) I feel the need to reply to this topic. Blah. If I sound bitchy, forgive me. ---- Okay, when we reject a layout and you want to yell at us asking why there are two things I'd like you to remember. One, when there's 50 skins in the queue and 20 are Xanga I will not remember your layout. Okay? So show it to me and I'll tell you why I rejected it. Two, I follow this for the most part. Then I have a set of standards I personally follow when submitting a skin so I apply those to other people's skin's too. They are as follows. ---- - High quality, non-grainy image. A good sixth of the layouts I reject lack this. Even MS Paint can have good image quality. - Nice, readable text and hyperlinks. If I can't read it, then how can anyone else? - A fairly decent color scheme. Purple does not go with brown and there's too much contrast in red&black. - A decent sized image. A 900KB image isn't very practical. Your main image shouldn't go over 500KB usually. - A non-default layout. You can not stick in a background, change the colors, and call it a day. Simplistic is good, but a layout like that will take you five minutes, tops. That's on a Myspace level to me. (Not including the div overlays!) ---- If you think that's too much to ask for, then that's too bad. Really, all I look for is a skin that looks decent and that has effort put into it. Cross-browser compatibility would be nice too. Hm. Yeah, most of these rules are pretty much common sense...except for the image size. perhaps it should be added to the official rules mentioned here [ http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=77054 ]. I didn't know about this link. I'm a big dumb butt for not even looking. Still I think they should put this link up on the page where people submit their skins. You know, for the dumb butts like me who think the only thing that matters is whats in front of them. Another thing, that screen shot tip is really helpful! Thanx! |
|
|
|
Shelley464 Skin Standards? Dec 24 2005, 11:40 PM
StanleyThePanda Well was the skin that was rejected/accepted the s... Dec 24 2005, 11:44 PM
Shelley464 I'm just talking in general with the skins I s... Dec 25 2005, 12:03 AM
Libertie We don't really have a "by the book... Dec 25 2005, 12:12 AM
Shelley464 Thanks so much for your guys' feedback to my f... Dec 25 2005, 12:33 AM
Spiritual Winged Aura By browsing through layouts, you'll understand... Dec 25 2005, 05:06 PM
digital.fragrance It's kind of cool to have different people acc... Dec 26 2005, 10:39 AM
x_signhere Wow interesting topic. I was wondering about this ... Dec 27 2005, 03:37 AM
niez_cho ^ if you think that your layout was rejected unfai... Dec 27 2005, 05:18 AM
mona lisa We currently don't have a system that lets us ... Dec 27 2005, 03:07 PM
niez_cho ^ //edit: oops you editted your post.
So do yo... Jan 1 2006, 10:08 AM
Shelley464 Thanks to everyone for your responses to my sugges... Dec 28 2005, 03:29 PM
Cake. Yeah, honestly, I like a lot of simpler layouts an... Dec 31 2005, 01:21 AM
nothing_plus_this i agree with the idea that the people doing the re... Dec 31 2005, 12:51 PM
mona lisa Uh, I'm sorry but do you not read?
You can PM... Dec 31 2005, 02:12 PM
nothing_plus_this you know what? whatever.
there's a lot you co... Dec 31 2005, 03:22 PM
mona lisa QUOTE(nothing_plus_this @ Dec 31 2005, 3:22 P... Dec 31 2005, 03:36 PM
nothing_plus_this my standards?
they're very minimal, i assure ... Dec 31 2005, 03:38 PM
mona lisa QUOTE(nothing_plus_this @ Dec 31 2005, 3:38 P... Dec 31 2005, 03:55 PM
digital.fragrance ^ ditto - don't just get angry or mean - get s... Dec 31 2005, 07:06 PM
Spiritual Winged Aura Yeah ! It's more to the point. Dec 31 2005, 08:29 PM
nothing_plus_this yeah, good point. i will try that. but i don't... Dec 31 2005, 08:52 PM
Shelley464 QUOTE(fishcake-y @ Jan 1 2006, 2:06 AM)I... Jan 1 2006, 02:39 PM
nothing_plus_this see, those standards are good. you KNOW what you... Jan 1 2006, 10:04 AM
nothing_plus_this well, i guess there's not really much else you... Jan 1 2006, 10:13 AM
fishcake-y Um... My standards are pretty much for all the mod... Jan 1 2006, 03:35 PM
nothing_plus_this i have something to admit.
i am a complete idiot ... Jan 1 2006, 05:09 PM
fishcake-y You don't really need to show anything but the... Jan 1 2006, 08:27 PM![]() ![]() |