Nominating yourself, For Layout contests |
 Jan 2 2006, 12:43 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Duplicate Posts: 1,912 Joined: May 2005 Member No: 137,527  |
Right now, the rules state that it is strongly dicouraged for someone to nominate themseselves, unless they feel that strongly that they are qualified. And I'm sure that the staff feels that they don't think that the people that nominate themselves layouts are that qualified, So I would think that one of the by-laws that be added would be to not allow anyone at all to nominate for their own myspace. becuase the whole point in nominations is to have someone else be a voice for you..
edit// It does turn-out that this is only the case in myspace, but I don't think it would go over to well if it was only a rule for the myspace-of-the-month but the decision rests in the hands of the by-law mods This post has been edited by tcunningham1589: Jan 2 2006, 01:00 AM |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
Jan 2 2006, 12:51 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 You'll find me in your dreams. Group: Official Member Posts: 8,536 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 114,010 |
Err... It may not be the case in Myspace but in Xanga most of them a rather qualified to nominate themselves.
 Actually, in everything but Myspace I think that's the case.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
tcunningham1589 Nominating yourself Jan 2 2006, 12:43 AM
incoherent are you talking about myspace of the month and peo... Jan 2 2006, 01:20 AM tcunningham1589 I know that it happens, It's just annoying to ... Jan 2 2006, 01:30 AM incoherent well, if people think its good enough, then so be ... Jan 2 2006, 01:33 AM Heathasm the loophole with this rule is the fact that peopl... Jan 2 2006, 03:59 AM disco infiltrator Or layouts that still use default coding of whatev... Jan 2 2006, 08:04 AM Libertie ^ I agree, I hate when people nominate themselves ... Jan 4 2006, 10:54 PM Spiritual Winged Aura Why not set a standard ? Jan 4 2006, 11:45 PM
Libertie I think it's a good idea and definitely someth... Jan 4 2006, 11:49 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: