Skin Standards? |
 Dec 24 2005, 11:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Member Posts: 52 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 307,384  |
Hi there!
First of all, I have to say that this is a kick-butt site. It's easy to navigate and use and a great source for skins. Secondly, I just wanted to voice a concern. I get confused sometimes by what standards the skins are being accepted under. It seems that what one mod would accept, another wouldn't. In the end, it's almost a matter of who you get reviewing your submission. So, I'm not complaining and in no way think that you guys hate me when I get rejected. :P It's just that I see such a broad spectrum of skins on here and see no line of standards, which makes it hard to understand what is considered good on the whole. Just a bit of feedback. Thanks again for a great site! |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
Dec 31 2005, 01:21 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 4,357 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 28,115 |
Yeah, honestly, I like a lot of simpler layouts and I guess some people like the defaultish ones. But I guess you can't just accept every layout that people submit, and I don't think it's fair that maybe if one person looks at your skin they'll reject it because they don't like it, but what if another mod liked it? i know it would take a while to garther up everyone and take a poll to see which skin should get rejected, though. this is oddly confusing.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Shelley464 Skin Standards? Dec 24 2005, 11:40 PM
StanleyThePanda Well was the skin that was rejected/accepted the s... Dec 24 2005, 11:44 PM Shelley464 I'm just talking in general with the skins I s... Dec 25 2005, 12:03 AM Libertie We don't really have a "by the book... Dec 25 2005, 12:12 AM Shelley464 Thanks so much for your guys' feedback to my f... Dec 25 2005, 12:33 AM Spiritual Winged Aura By browsing through layouts, you'll understand... Dec 25 2005, 05:06 PM digital.fragrance It's kind of cool to have different people acc... Dec 26 2005, 10:39 AM x_signhere Wow interesting topic. I was wondering about this ... Dec 27 2005, 03:37 AM niez_cho ^ if you think that your layout was rejected unfai... Dec 27 2005, 05:18 AM mona lisa We currently don't have a system that lets us ... Dec 27 2005, 03:07 PM
niez_cho ^ //edit: oops you editted your post.
So do yo... Jan 1 2006, 10:08 AM Shelley464 Thanks to everyone for your responses to my sugges... Dec 28 2005, 03:29 PM nothing_plus_this i agree with the idea that the people doing the re... Dec 31 2005, 12:51 PM mona lisa Uh, I'm sorry but do you not read?
You can PM... Dec 31 2005, 02:12 PM nothing_plus_this you know what? whatever.
there's a lot you co... Dec 31 2005, 03:22 PM mona lisa QUOTE(nothing_plus_this @ Dec 31 2005, 3:22 P... Dec 31 2005, 03:36 PM nothing_plus_this my standards?
they're very minimal, i assure ... Dec 31 2005, 03:38 PM mona lisa QUOTE(nothing_plus_this @ Dec 31 2005, 3:38 P... Dec 31 2005, 03:55 PM digital.fragrance ^ ditto - don't just get angry or mean - get s... Dec 31 2005, 07:06 PM Spiritual Winged Aura Yeah ! It's more to the point. Dec 31 2005, 08:29 PM nothing_plus_this yeah, good point. i will try that. but i don't... Dec 31 2005, 08:52 PM fishcake-y I feel the need to reply to this topic. Blah. If I... Jan 1 2006, 03:06 AM Shelley464 QUOTE(fishcake-y @ Jan 1 2006, 2:06 AM)I... Jan 1 2006, 02:39 PM x_signhere QUOTE(fishcake-y @ Jan 1 2006, 6:06 PM)I... Jan 3 2006, 08:31 AM nothing_plus_this see, those standards are good. you KNOW what you... Jan 1 2006, 10:04 AM nothing_plus_this well, i guess there's not really much else you... Jan 1 2006, 10:13 AM fishcake-y Um... My standards are pretty much for all the mod... Jan 1 2006, 03:35 PM nothing_plus_this i have something to admit.
i am a complete idiot ... Jan 1 2006, 05:09 PM fishcake-y You don't really need to show anything but the... Jan 1 2006, 08:27 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: