Ugly & Rich or Gorgeous & Poor? |
Ugly & Rich or Gorgeous & Poor? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() omgah_itsmaggiex=new username. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 785 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,467 ![]() |
id probably have to go with gorgeous and poor. it kinda sounds like gold digging the other way. =]
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Infinite's End ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 180 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 193,597 ![]() |
Although looks don’t matter much to me, I chose for him to be poor and gorgeous, but either one would be all right, because if he was fabulously wealthy he could contribute (his money) more easily to the less fortunate. Also, he is most likely uncorrupted by greed, and the other negative traits that seem to go hand in hand with wealth.
You could be a genius with a strong moral character that just never got lucky, or donates their extra money to charities. The vast majority of ridiculously wealthy people today come from old money families; compared to them, Donald Trump appears poor (but publicized). Wealth by no means guaruntee's one's respect, and again, I use Donald Trump as my example, he is a selfish, evil, uncompassionate man. If the rich are more morally good than the poor, than Scrooge was more fit to live than Tiny Tim, and if one paid attention to the Ghost of Christmas Present, he was less fit to live than millions like Tiny Tim. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |