Skin Standards? |
 Dec 24 2005, 11:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Member Posts: 52 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 307,384  |
Hi there!
First of all, I have to say that this is a kick-butt site. It's easy to navigate and use and a great source for skins. Secondly, I just wanted to voice a concern. I get confused sometimes by what standards the skins are being accepted under. It seems that what one mod would accept, another wouldn't. In the end, it's almost a matter of who you get reviewing your submission. So, I'm not complaining and in no way think that you guys hate me when I get rejected. :P It's just that I see such a broad spectrum of skins on here and see no line of standards, which makes it hard to understand what is considered good on the whole. Just a bit of feedback. Thanks again for a great site! |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
Dec 28 2005, 03:29 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 52 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 307,384 |
Thanks to everyone for your responses to my suggestion! Someone brought up the idea of letting those reviewing the layouts say why it is being rejected and I think that would help in many cases. I guess I'm just hoping that the reviewers will not only pick digitally insane ones that have used numerous brushes and such, but that the simpler layouts will be considered as well. I just prefer the cleaner, simpler layouts. Thanks again for everyone's responses!
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Shelley464 Skin Standards? Dec 24 2005, 11:40 PM
StanleyThePanda Well was the skin that was rejected/accepted the s... Dec 24 2005, 11:44 PM Shelley464 I'm just talking in general with the skins I s... Dec 25 2005, 12:03 AM Libertie We don't really have a "by the book... Dec 25 2005, 12:12 AM Shelley464 Thanks so much for your guys' feedback to my f... Dec 25 2005, 12:33 AM Spiritual Winged Aura By browsing through layouts, you'll understand... Dec 25 2005, 05:06 PM digital.fragrance It's kind of cool to have different people acc... Dec 26 2005, 10:39 AM x_signhere Wow interesting topic. I was wondering about this ... Dec 27 2005, 03:37 AM niez_cho ^ if you think that your layout was rejected unfai... Dec 27 2005, 05:18 AM mona lisa We currently don't have a system that lets us ... Dec 27 2005, 03:07 PM
niez_cho ^ //edit: oops you editted your post.
So do yo... Jan 1 2006, 10:08 AM Cake. Yeah, honestly, I like a lot of simpler layouts an... Dec 31 2005, 01:21 AM nothing_plus_this i agree with the idea that the people doing the re... Dec 31 2005, 12:51 PM mona lisa Uh, I'm sorry but do you not read?
You can PM... Dec 31 2005, 02:12 PM nothing_plus_this you know what? whatever.
there's a lot you co... Dec 31 2005, 03:22 PM mona lisa QUOTE(nothing_plus_this @ Dec 31 2005, 3:22 P... Dec 31 2005, 03:36 PM nothing_plus_this my standards?
they're very minimal, i assure ... Dec 31 2005, 03:38 PM mona lisa QUOTE(nothing_plus_this @ Dec 31 2005, 3:38 P... Dec 31 2005, 03:55 PM digital.fragrance ^ ditto - don't just get angry or mean - get s... Dec 31 2005, 07:06 PM Spiritual Winged Aura Yeah ! It's more to the point. Dec 31 2005, 08:29 PM nothing_plus_this yeah, good point. i will try that. but i don't... Dec 31 2005, 08:52 PM fishcake-y I feel the need to reply to this topic. Blah. If I... Jan 1 2006, 03:06 AM Shelley464 QUOTE(fishcake-y @ Jan 1 2006, 2:06 AM)I... Jan 1 2006, 02:39 PM x_signhere QUOTE(fishcake-y @ Jan 1 2006, 6:06 PM)I... Jan 3 2006, 08:31 AM nothing_plus_this see, those standards are good. you KNOW what you... Jan 1 2006, 10:04 AM nothing_plus_this well, i guess there's not really much else you... Jan 1 2006, 10:13 AM fishcake-y Um... My standards are pretty much for all the mod... Jan 1 2006, 03:35 PM nothing_plus_this i have something to admit.
i am a complete idiot ... Jan 1 2006, 05:09 PM fishcake-y You don't really need to show anything but the... Jan 1 2006, 08:27 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: