Judge rules against intelligent design Options

[*mipadi*]

HARRISBURG, Pa. - "Intelligent design" is "a religious alternative masquerading as a scientific theory" and cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial.

Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said.

“We find that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board’s real purpose, which was to promote religion in the public school classroom,” he wrote in his 139-page opinion.

Source

[dreamergirl]

Someone tell me what viable evidence do evolutionists have that we "evolved from monkeys"?????? NONE!!!!!!! Whats more probable: that we where created from an intelligent Designer, or that we came from apes. Whats easier to believe. For me its the Designer. Everything that man makes has a designer. Clothes, jewelery, computers, games, household stuff, everything was designed and made by someone.
Lets see............. OK say you take all the little pieces it takes to make a watch and put them on the ground. Can someone here honestly believe that those pieces are gonna "evolve" into a watch over a million or even a billion years? I dont, and that whole senario is impossible. So, if watches and everything else cant evolve, how can people believe that human beings can? We are a million times more complex of a structure than any watch. We are special, designed by someone. NOT EVOLVED!!!