Judge rules against intelligent design |
Judge rules against intelligent design |
*mipadi* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE HARRISBURG, Pa. - "Intelligent design" is "a religious alternative masquerading as a scientific theory" and cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania public school district, a federal judge said Tuesday, ruling in one of the biggest courtroom clashes on evolution since the 1925 Scopes trial. Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology curriculum must include the notion that life on Earth was produced by an unidentified intelligent cause, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III said. “We find that the secular purposes claimed by the Board amount to a pretext for the Board’s real purpose, which was to promote religion in the public school classroom,” he wrote in his 139-page opinion. Source |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Lauren loves YOU. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,357 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 32,793 ![]() |
I believe in intelligent design, but I do think the judge's ruling was fair.
Considering there isn't really any hard scientific evidence to back up intelligent design since it is based mostly on faith, it's only fair that science teachers don't teach it in their classes. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |