Nintendo Revolutions Controller, Lets check it out.. |
Nintendo Revolutions Controller, Lets check it out.. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() cB Assassin ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 10,147 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,672 ![]() |
The new Nintendo Revolution's Controller looks really interesting. Nintendo said they want to change the way we play video games. I think out of the three system, Nintendo to me looks the most promising. The X-Box 360 only has a few new features and slightly better graphics. But basically everything is the same. Here's a link to the Nintendo Revolution's new controller.
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3143782 |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() L!ckitySplit ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 4,325 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 129,329 ![]() |
sometimes the feeling i get from nintendo is that im an experiment.
one fault that nintendo has is that they experiment a little too much, which means somethig may be good, or something may be okay, or something may be bad. for example, DS and PSP, (i own both). DS sure, its more innovative with the touch screen and mic and all, but does that mean i have more fun with it than my psp? no, not necessarily. to me a touch screen doesnt beat an overall game. nintendo is too focused on HOW you play the game, than the game itself. because i have more fun with the initial games on the psp, like metal gear ac!d and tony hawks american wasteland or need for speed underground rivals. and even when the games come out for both handhelds, i still have more fun with it on the psp. the touch screen can only do so much for me. i always feel like its not necessarily needed. when it comes down to it, i think nintendo forgets that the games are supposed to create the fun, not a controller or a touch screen. because what matters, is what the game it plays is like. i fear that the controller will make games too simplistic and arcade like. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |