new hiring process, pros and cons |
new hiring process, pros and cons |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
so, i was talking with someone about this about 2 minutes ago and wanted to know what everyone though of how it went being the first time it was implimented.
i didnt want to put this just randomly in another thread, i wanted it to be seen. so, pros and cons. pros -i liked the idea of nominations. cons -nominations seemed like endorsements which we did away with due to the fact that only people were picking their friends. i did talk to many mods, and noted it for myself too, that mods werent nominating just friends. i was nominated by 3 people i didnt even talk to. -not everyone seems to get their chance. just because they dont stand out, doesnt mean they shouldnt be given a shot. sure, there was the discussion thread, but how much of that was taken in when nominations were made? |
|
|
![]() |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
alright...so if everyone is against writing out a paragraph about mod experience and how someone can be "fake" about it...just make it like nominations, but a person can nominate themself. just make a thread for all of the interested and they can just reply by saying something like "im in" or whatnot. like kiera said...
QUOTE the application process doesnt sway much in whether you get modded at all with that being said, no one is going to be picked on how fake they were. its their overall general being in the forums. if they dont stand out, they should at least be given a chance even if they are not going to be modded. everyone deserves a chance to be at least evaluated.i guess what im saying is mods can nominate people who feel that they make great mods if someone or themselves didnt nominate themselves. so in other words...a person can nominate themself, someone else can nominate someone, or a mod can nominate them giving everyone a fair chance. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |