the moderator hiring process, the completion of |
 Nov 21 2005, 02:23 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 cb's #1 fan! =)  Group: Advisor Posts: 2,342 Joined: Nov 2003 Member No: 1  |
there are a couple of things you guys missed when voting in the mod hiring process. it should be more comprehensive and should include:
-alloted time for the different steps of the process, for example, one week for nominations, three days for nominees accepting... etc -where its being held and that a supplimentary discussion topic will be created in the lounge -how exactly will admins come up with the final decisions? its better that we make everything transparent. a tip when writing / amending bylaws, remember to ask and include: -why? why do we need this? -what? all the whats, ie what abilities do have members have? -when? when should it take place? -who? who should be involved? -where? where should it take place? -how? how exactly will it take place? |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
| *Guest* |
Dec 4 2005, 05:24 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
i think we also need to discuss the way reappointment fits into the hiring process.
i mean, peopl ehave talked about one of the disadvantages of jeff being remodded is that he stepped down. yet eve has just been remodded straight back to her head staff position. and jackie was remodded numerous times. does it relate to how long they were a mod? or how long it has been since they stepped down? |
|
|
|
|
Dec 4 2005, 04:47 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 i lost weight with Mulder! Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,070 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 79,019 |
QUOTE(Guest @ Dec 4 2005, 5:24 AM) i think we also need to discuss the way reappointment fits into the hiring process. i mean, peopl ehave talked about one of the disadvantages of jeff being remodded is that he stepped down. yet eve has just been remodded straight back to her head staff position. and jackie was remodded numerous times. does it relate to how long they were a mod? or how long it has been since they stepped down?  i think if you're remodded, you shouldnt immediately be put back in a head staff/admin/design staff position, because they were demodded/stepped down for a reason. i do think that old mods should be considered for mods now..but not above those who were never mods before. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 4 2005, 05:16 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 :hammer: Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,849 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,700 |
QUOTE(insomniac @ Dec 4 2005, 2:47 PM) i think if you're remodded, you shouldnt immediately be put back in a head staff/admin/design staff position, because they were demodded/stepped down for a reason. i do think that old mods should be considered for mods now..but not above those who were never mods before. Why does it matter if they stepped down themselves ? I can see what you mean if they were demodded for a reason... but ? For Head Staff and Admins... you have to be a regular mod to be appointed to Head Staff and you have to be a Head Staff to be appointed to Admin. So why would that destroy the chances of new people applying for staff ? And I've never heard of the disadvantages of Jeff being remodded is because he stepped down. Where've you heard that from ? |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
micron the moderator hiring process Nov 21 2005, 02:23 AM
micron also posted this backstage and i quote:
QUOTEoh y... Nov 21 2005, 02:24 AM micron another from backstage,
QUOTE(disco infiltrator ... Nov 21 2005, 03:05 AM add1cted2f1re well that seems a lot more fair than the way votin... Nov 21 2005, 03:10 AM
micron QUOTE(add1cted2f1re @ Nov 21 2005, 4:10 AM)we... Nov 21 2005, 03:12 AM Heathasm QUOTE-alloted time for the different steps of the ... Nov 21 2005, 11:00 AM incoherent QUOTEi think that it should go souley on how the v... Nov 21 2005, 11:05 AM mzkandi QUOTE-alloted time for the different steps of the ... Nov 21 2005, 11:10 AM disco infiltrator I agree with Kiera. Heads/Admins should use mod an... Nov 21 2005, 04:55 PM racoons > you ^
i agree with that. although, how do we decied w... Nov 21 2005, 05:25 PM not_your_average You think we should close this since the moderatin... Nov 21 2005, 05:27 PM mona lisa I don't know. Three days for the final decisio... Nov 21 2005, 05:37 PM racoons > you QUOTEYou think we should close this since the mode... Nov 21 2005, 05:43 PM mona lisa 5 days or a week. Either is fine. Well, a week may... Nov 21 2005, 05:50 PM Retrogressive Shouldn't the mod nominations be behind the sc... Nov 21 2005, 06:13 PM disco infiltrator Well, that's why there's that thread. :]
... Nov 21 2005, 06:22 PM Retrogressive QUOTE(disco infiltrator @ Nov 21 2005, 6:22 P... Nov 21 2005, 07:32 PM incoherent i think they are fine as they are. people are stil... Nov 21 2005, 07:40 PM Retrogressive At least a mod wouldn't be publically critisiz... Nov 21 2005, 07:46 PM incoherent well they are still going to be critisized nonethe... Nov 21 2005, 07:48 PM Retrogressive Yes, and that's why the mods consider communit... Nov 21 2005, 07:50 PM sadolakced acid yea, i think it might be better if nominations wer... Nov 22 2005, 08:43 AM racoons > you actually, i think that, where there have been call... Nov 22 2005, 05:50 PM Retrogressive That's a good point. Nov 22 2005, 05:59 PM Spiritual Winged Aura I have another idea.
Only one administration wou... Nov 23 2005, 03:42 AM mzkandi QUOTE(Spiritual Winged Aura @ Nov 23 2005, 3:... Nov 23 2005, 12:32 PM incoherent ^
that wouldnt work because you cant post anonymou... Nov 23 2005, 12:25 PM sadolakced acid what could be done is that mod nominations are PMe... Nov 23 2005, 01:31 PM incoherent ^
doesnt sound like a bad idea...maybe put and adm... Nov 23 2005, 01:37 PM sadolakced acid ^ probably just an active mod, no need to further... Nov 23 2005, 02:06 PM mzkandi I personally dont see anything wrong with the way ... Nov 23 2005, 02:12 PM racoons > you i dont fully understand that, stephen Nov 24 2005, 01:21 PM incoherent whos stephen?
Spiritual Winged Aura? Nov 24 2005, 04:27 PM mzkandi ^That would be correct. Nov 24 2005, 04:31 PM incoherent oh...well what did he say that you didnt get? Nov 24 2005, 04:34 PM mzkandi ^ James is the one who didnt get what he said. Nov 24 2005, 04:44 PM incoherent thats who it was directed to. sorry for the confus... Nov 24 2005, 04:45 PM racoons > you i didnt understand the suggestion he made Nov 24 2005, 05:11 PM micron ok guys, discussion is good and all, but the allot... Nov 25 2005, 10:07 AM Heathasm unless we can find some sort of alternate poll tha... Nov 25 2005, 03:50 PM sadolakced acid unless it's voting backstage, by mods. then e... Nov 25 2005, 04:27 PM disco infiltrator Well, the polls were for the community, not the mo... Nov 25 2005, 04:50 PM sadolakced acid three guesses who'd be first in a comunity pol... Nov 25 2005, 04:53 PM racoons > you i dunno, justin... i bet you coul give him a good ... Nov 25 2005, 05:30 PM yanners i found the accepting of the nominations a bit sho... Nov 27 2005, 03:44 AM micron hi all,
this time, im going forgo the polls and cr... Nov 27 2005, 09:09 PM Spiritual Winged Aura I'm not stephen. I'm STEVEN.
QUOTE(incoh... Nov 27 2005, 11:40 PM mzkandi Well to be fair, if you were around more we know t... Nov 27 2005, 11:41 PM insomniac QUOTE(mzkandi @ Nov 27 2005, 11:41 PM)Well to... Nov 28 2005, 06:07 PM yanners ^ hahah no, i got confused about the time deadline... Nov 28 2005, 01:16 AM mona lisa In a day? I thought the new staff would be announc... Nov 28 2005, 06:10 PM mzkandi ^ Yeah, plus we have dicussion thread backstage s... Nov 28 2005, 06:12 PM yanners would it be okay to open a thread for discussions ... Nov 29 2005, 04:27 AM Fabio. I hope this isn't too off-topic, but how much ... Nov 29 2005, 03:20 PM mzkandi ^ Community input is taken in consideration howeve... Nov 29 2005, 03:24 PM Fabio. Okay, thanks Kiera! I think I understand a bit... Nov 29 2005, 03:28 PM racoons > you when did we propose a day to finalize the decision... Nov 29 2005, 03:29 PM mzkandi ^huh? Nov 29 2005, 03:29 PM racoons > you you said something about more than a day to choose... Nov 29 2005, 03:48 PM mzkandi ^ Oh yeah, its been taken care of. Nov 29 2005, 03:50 PM yanners kierraaaa..what did you mean by a
QUOTEbluk decisi... Nov 30 2005, 05:00 AM Madame C ^ I believe she meant "bulk" decision, m... Nov 30 2005, 12:03 PM mzkandi ^ Thanks, Carrie =) Yes, thats what I meant. Nov 30 2005, 01:14 PM sadolakced acid i think the conditions of thier resignation must b... Dec 4 2005, 05:23 PM Heathasm i think the whole point of not modding people into... Dec 4 2005, 05:27 PM disco infiltrator Eve and Jackie never said they stepped down indefi... Dec 4 2005, 05:30 PM x_angawhomps Ahhh, resignation over controversy. Good point. Dec 4 2005, 05:31 PM insomniac i meant that if someone stepped down because they ... Dec 4 2005, 06:58 PM sadolakced acid well, i see moderators stepping down for breaks an... Dec 4 2005, 07:18 PM toonekked so when can new people apply, and when will the ne... Mar 1 2006, 08:42 PM toonekked [/spam]? ^damnit. Mar 1 2006, 09:21 PM Statues/Shadows You can post with unregistered accounts? Mar 1 2006, 09:23 PM ranniel yes, I think so. ^ micron enabled guests to post. Mar 2 2006, 11:00 PM Libertie QUOTE(micron)will separate into two forums if ther... Mar 2 2006, 11:06 PM incoherent alright, whoever that was just changed the guest n... Mar 3 2006, 09:28 PM Maestro ^Can you not see the IP address, since you're ... Mar 3 2006, 10:41 PM incoherent ^nope
we only have modding powers. Mar 4 2006, 10:14 AM disco infiltrator I can see IPs; I know who it is, it's not Tris... Mar 4 2006, 01:26 PM Statues/Shadows Since when was seeing IP addresses not a mod power... Mar 4 2006, 01:53 PM disco infiltrator They only have closing/moving/etc. powers. Mar 4 2006, 02:19 PM incoherent yeah, we have all the powers EXCPET seeing ips. Mar 4 2006, 02:28 PM ranniel umm thats just Teresa (umm yeah i forgot her sn). ... Mar 4 2006, 03:33 PM skp86 question: why has this topic been bumped?
the modd... Mar 5 2006, 03:13 PM Rachel is love QUOTE(skp86 @ Mar 5 2006, 1:13 PM) questi... Mar 5 2006, 06:13 PM mzkandi ...meh. Mar 5 2006, 03:35 PM incoherent i knew someone would reopen this.
i just didnt wa... Mar 5 2006, 06:15 PM Rachel is love Well it is pointless to close it because one perso... Mar 5 2006, 06:25 PM mzkandi I figured someone would reopen this too.
Anyway... Mar 5 2006, 07:30 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: