the moderator hiring process, the completion of |
the moderator hiring process, the completion of |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() cb's #1 fan! =) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advisor Posts: 2,342 Joined: Nov 2003 Member No: 1 ![]() |
there are a couple of things you guys missed when voting in the mod hiring process. it should be more comprehensive and should include:
-alloted time for the different steps of the process, for example, one week for nominations, three days for nominees accepting... etc -where its being held and that a supplimentary discussion topic will be created in the lounge -how exactly will admins come up with the final decisions? its better that we make everything transparent. a tip when writing / amending bylaws, remember to ask and include: -why? why do we need this? -what? all the whats, ie what abilities do have members have? -when? when should it take place? -who? who should be involved? -where? where should it take place? -how? how exactly will it take place? |
|
|
![]() |
*Guest* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
i think we also need to discuss the way reappointment fits into the hiring process.
i mean, peopl ehave talked about one of the disadvantages of jeff being remodded is that he stepped down. yet eve has just been remodded straight back to her head staff position. and jackie was remodded numerous times. does it relate to how long they were a mod? or how long it has been since they stepped down? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |