the moderator hiring process, the completion of |
the moderator hiring process, the completion of |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() cb's #1 fan! =) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advisor Posts: 2,342 Joined: Nov 2003 Member No: 1 ![]() |
there are a couple of things you guys missed when voting in the mod hiring process. it should be more comprehensive and should include:
-alloted time for the different steps of the process, for example, one week for nominations, three days for nominees accepting... etc -where its being held and that a supplimentary discussion topic will be created in the lounge -how exactly will admins come up with the final decisions? its better that we make everything transparent. a tip when writing / amending bylaws, remember to ask and include: -why? why do we need this? -what? all the whats, ie what abilities do have members have? -when? when should it take place? -who? who should be involved? -where? where should it take place? -how? how exactly will it take place? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 ![]() |
QUOTE You think we should close this since the moderating hiring process has already started? no. we can easily resolve this within a week, which seems to be the amount of time being thrown about leave nominations open for. and mona, i sympathise... you would know, you've done it directly... how long do you think admins/heads will need? 5 days? a week? as for jusun... he does a phenomenaljob for cb, and it is HIS site. but... and this is perfectly understandable.. he isnt on a lot. i dont know exactly how much direct input he should have. there is a reason he isnt actually an adminsitrator |
|
|
![]() ![]() |