New staff nominations discussion |
New staff nominations discussion |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() cb's #1 fan! =) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advisor Posts: 2,342 Joined: Nov 2003 Member No: 1 ![]() |
We're looking to add to the staff team. Although only staff members are allowed to post in the actual nomination topic, you can influence their decisions by posting here who you think should be nominated and why.
Also, do not PM moderators to nominate you. If you are qualified enough you will be nominated. All PM's to moderators requesting a nomination will be ignored. ![]() Lastly, this not a place you nominate you or someone else. This thread is to discuss the current nominees the staff has made. This post has been edited by mzkandi: Nov 21 2005, 06:43 PM |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() 白人看不懂 !!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,838 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 40,824 ![]() |
I guess I'm part of the old school.
To tell you the truth, after being gone for so long I feel a disconnection with the people, so I really do understand if I don't get nominated. All I have is all your views and prior opinions of me when I was a People Staff half a year ago. Umm so I'll go with my original mission statement that I made last time: I only want to be People Staff so I can facilitate the exchange of community, information, and advice to different people of every part of the world. I feel I stuck with my goal throughout my time as People Staff. I really do feel like I did. Of course, I will never, ever, ever forgive myself for creating that damn Moderator Performance thread. Personally, I was against the creation of it. From what I can tell, it just brought down more mods from their positions than help anyone at all. But I did it for the community. They wanted it, I did it, ensuing the creation of the feedback forum. Which I think is an ok forum. =] So I won't make a horribly long bid like last time, but to reiterate my mission in being People Staff is not for power and all that but to help in the exchange of community, information, and advice. To create a schema, I would be the guy w/ a white chef uniform replacing the food (information) in a buffet line. So whatever you feel like, no bid or yes bid, I know you guys still know I love ya guys and gals! =] |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() say maydayism. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,447 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 26,344 ![]() |
QUOTE(DaTru KataLYST @ Nov 21 2005, 3:38 PM) I guess I'm part of the old school. To tell you the truth, after being gone for so long I feel a disconnection with the people, so I really do understand if I don't get nominated. All I have is all your views and prior opinions of me when I was a People Staff half a year ago. Umm so I'll go with my original mission statement that I made last time: I only want to be People Staff so I can facilitate the exchange of community, information, and advice to different people of every part of the world. I feel I stuck with my goal throughout my time as People Staff. I really do feel like I did. Of course, I will never, ever, ever forgive myself for creating that damn Moderator Performance thread. Personally, I was against the creation of it. From what I can tell, it just brought down more mods from their positions than help anyone at all. But I did it for the community. They wanted it, I did it, ensuing the creation of the feedback forum. Which I think is an ok forum. =] So I won't make a horribly long bid like last time, but to reiterate my mission in being People Staff is not for power and all that but to help in the exchange of community, information, and advice. To create a schema, I would be the guy w/ a white chef uniform replacing the food (information) in a buffet line. So whatever you feel like, no bid or yes bid, I know you guys still know I love ya guys and gals! =] I think you should be nominated. ![]() You definitely did a great job when you were one, and I believe that you can contribute more if you are back as staff. I also go for the active by-law mods to become actual mods. ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |