Are you religous?, And Why? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Are you religous?, And Why? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Cockadoodledoo Mother Fcuka!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,438 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 296,088 ![]() |
because of the recent debate i've been having in the "Jesus... is he Gay?" thread, i've decided to make a new thread so that I can argue eith ppl and not be off-topic. When anyone is ready, ill start the assault.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Cockadoodledoo Mother Fcuka!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,438 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 296,088 ![]() |
wow..... you'd rather ppl act like sheep so that they can feel good about themselves........damn i ca't stad weak minded ppl
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Resident Jerk. Is Wade. Respond to PM's! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 344 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 289,510 ![]() |
QUOTE(vash1530 @ Nov 20 2005, 9:41 PM) wow..... you'd rather ppl act like sheep so that they can feel good about themselves........damn i ca't stad weak minded ppl I don't know what that was a response to, but I guess I'll share my views off of that. I don't like Christianity. The easiest way to make a case that there is no Christian god is to read the bible. Most Christians haven't even read the damn book, and my atheist friends know more about it than the Christians do. The bible is a case against intelligence, and I can't respect that. I respect Buddhism because it seems to carry the most truth, and is the least abraisive about the spirituality part. There are some theories in this philosophy that are fun to speculate, but are nearly impossible to prove, such as chakras and karma. All the figure heads of this religion are extremely intelligent and balanced individuals, and I hold high respect for that. I was born and raised catholic for the first year of my life, then moved over to that general christian thing until I was in middleschool, then when I was smart enough to choose my own religion instead of subscribing to the easy answers, I chose Buddhism. Just as of recently, I've renounced my faith in anything but science and what I can see is real. This is why I don't think I have a proper footing to convince any sheep of any sort of improper thought unless I can prove the opposite of their case, which isn't possible with anything relating to faith, IMHO. Faith, once founded, is separate and sometimes an opposite to logic. Fighting something with logic that is obviously not logic at all is counterproductive, because both sides could be wrong, but neither will concede defeat, and there is no way to tell, even if a side does "lose". |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Cockadoodledoo Mother Fcuka!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,438 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 296,088 ![]() |
QUOTE(verlorenrivets @ Nov 20 2005, 11:03 PM) I don't know what that was a response to, but I guess I'll share my views off of that. I don't like Christianity. The easiest way to make a case that there is no Christian god is to read the bible. Most Christians haven't even read the damn book, and my atheist friends know more about it than the Christians do. The bible is a case against intelligence, and I can't respect that. I respect Buddhism because it seems to carry the most truth, and is the least abraisive about the spirituality part. There are some theories in this philosophy that are fun to speculate, but are nearly impossible to prove, such as chakras and karma. All the figure heads of this religion are extremely intelligent and balanced individuals, and I hold high respect for that. I was born and raised catholic for the first year of my life, then moved over to that general christian thing until I was in middleschool, then when I was smart enough to choose my own religion instead of subscribing to the easy answers, I chose Buddhism. Just as of recently, I've renounced my faith in anything but science and what I can see is real. This is why I don't think I have a proper footing to convince any sheep of any sort of improper thought unless I can prove the opposite of their case, which isn't possible with anything relating to faith, IMHO. Faith, once founded, is separate and sometimes an opposite to logic. Fighting something with logic that is obviously not logic at all is counterproductive, because both sides could be wrong, but neither will concede defeat, and there is no way to tell, even if a side does "lose". somehow you put my thoughts into words. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |