Does bush suck? Options

[WildGriffin]

I'm stealing this from someone. I'm not too sure, you can't really tell these things till after a term. But so far, he's on the road to suckage.

He sucked before he was prez., didnt he have a couple DWI's or DUI's or whatever the fark they're called? He also ditched his duties as a national guardsmen or whatever. And...he was a coke head.

So says my political bible written by a democratic satirist, "lies and the lying liars who tell them."

[*NatiMarie*]

Bush does suck, we should have another president. Someone smart, someone loyal to their country, someone great and just has a great personality-->me.
=)
j/k
Yeah, I don't know. I don't like Bush because of the War of Iraq thing. I'm so proud of myself because I did a report on this and let me paste down some of what I wrote in my report. Yay! *feels smart for once*

The only person deciding for this war of Iraq, at this moment, is George Bush. His decision is based on the fear of Iraq having weapons of mass destruction. The article called “The Blame Game”, by David Corn, states that George Bush “…claimed a 1998 International Atomic Energy Agency report had said Iraq was six months away from producing a bomb,” (Corn 14). The awkwardness of this account is that no such report existed, and in 1998, the IAEA said that its inspectors “…destroyed the known components of Iraq’s nuclear weapons program,” (Corn 14). The question of this matter is why did Bush make this assumption without having the facts corrected? The U.S. senators are also questioning this decision of his. They are also doubtful of some of his decisions and whether it will lead to a better or worse future for fellow countries (i.e.: Iraq). In the article in Reuters entitled, “Senators Argue Over Iraq as Next Vietnam,” some of the U.S. senators were arguing if the conflict of Iraq was becoming the next Vietnam. Here it is shown how George Bush has the most power of decision and many even pointed out that Iraq was “George Bush’s Vietnam.”