warnings and suspensions Options

[*tweeak*]

Now, there's a similar topic, but this is more specific.

Shouldn't there be a limit that if a person gets warned (or, uh, IP banned?) a certain amount of times, that they'll be automatically supended for any further misdemeanor? If we're just going to keep warning people but don't take any real actions under the guise of second chances, they won't stop. I mean, the warnings along won't do anything. After the first one or two, shouldn't it be required that stricter actions be taken? I don't mean extremely harsh or anything, and I don't want to bring in specifics, but some things seem a bit not quite right.

DO NOT BRING ME INTO THIS. That is drama that does NOT need to be continued.

[racoons > you]

i agree. shall we vot eon that format

So lets put numbers into this. How many chances do you think should be given before a suspension or possible ip ban is followed?

I say two warnings (one verbal, one raised) should be given before the possiblity of suspension may be carried out. And maybe two to three suspensions before a possible ip ban may be carried. Of coures, all of this would depend on the offense so these numbers can be played around with.

all in favour of kiera's format, say aye, all those opposed, say nay

aye