warnings and suspensions |
| *tweeak* |
 Nov 11 2005, 08:45 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest  |
Now, there's a similar topic, but this is more specific.
Shouldn't there be a limit that if a person gets warned (or, uh, IP banned?) a certain amount of times, that they'll be automatically supended for any further misdemeanor? If we're just going to keep warning people but don't take any real actions under the guise of second chances, they won't stop. I mean, the warnings along won't do anything. After the first one or two, shouldn't it be required that stricter actions be taken? I don't mean extremely harsh or anything, and I don't want to bring in specifics, but some things seem a bit not quite right. DO NOT BRING ME INTO THIS. That is drama that does NOT need to be continued. |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
| *mzkandi* |
Nov 11 2005, 10:10 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
I agree. Simply warning people with without any futher punishment if their actions continues or gets worse doesnt solve anything. I think after so many warnings you should get suspended and after so many suspensions a possiblity of an IP ban should folow (just a suggestion). Like, for example. after two warnings in say one months time would be followed by a suspension. If that member comes back from that suspension and decides he/she doesnt want to abide by the rules, another suspension would follow. After that suspension a possiblity of an IP ban would be a consequence should that member decide to act out again depending on the offense.
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Nov 12 2005, 01:43 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Nov 11 2005, 9:10 PM) I agree. Simply warning people with without any futher punishment if their actions continues or gets worse doesnt solve anything. I think after so many warnings you should get suspended and after so many suspensions a possiblity of an IP ban should folow (just a suggestion). Like, for example. afrer two warnings in say one months time would be followed by a suspension. If that member comes back from that suspension and decides he/she doesnt want to abide by the rules, another suspension would follow. After that suspension a possiblity of an IP would be a consequence should that member decide to act out again depending on the offense. agreed. i was talking to nicki about it...i think. they shouldnt just be banned, but be allowed to come back and be given a second chance.
 |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
tweeak warnings and suspensions Nov 11 2005, 08:45 PM
racoons > you yes. i agree.
there is a reason these people have... Nov 12 2005, 05:07 AM mzkandi So lets put numbers into this. How many chances do... Nov 12 2005, 12:08 PM incoherent ^
that sounds like a good idea. verbal warnings ar... Nov 12 2005, 01:55 PM racoons > you i agree. shall we vot eon that format
QUOTESo let... Nov 13 2005, 06:37 AM disco infiltrator Aye. Nov 13 2005, 10:49 AM mzkandi aye. Nov 13 2005, 02:48 PM incoherent aye Nov 13 2005, 03:02 PM tweeak aye Nov 13 2005, 03:02 PM mipadi Aye Nov 13 2005, 05:11 PM Rachel is love Aye Nov 13 2005, 10:51 PM Heathasm aye Nov 13 2005, 11:15 PM incoherent thats 8 ayes already.
i think the motion passed. Nov 14 2005, 07:55 AM racoons > you indeed. motion passed, someone update the passed b... Nov 14 2005, 02:33 PM
incoherent added
topic closed Nov 14 2005, 02:57 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: