Global Comradery, or lack of |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Global Comradery, or lack of |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Sing to Me ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,825 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 10,808 ![]() |
Generally, a country (or the United Nations as a whole) is expected to NOT be involved in another country's domestic affairs (keep out of my country and I'll do the same). I believe that this rule was set after World War II but I'm not sure.
Is this a good rule? To a degree, I think so because other countries don't impede on another's right to self rule. While America is evident in many countries, it doesn't take a direct reign. In fact, America has had a long history of isolation. However, in instances such as Africa (where many countries are ravaged by disease, famine, and warloads) and India (where AIDS is growing), I think it's the duty as fellow humans to help them. I'm aware that countries do help places in Africa and India. However, a majority of these efforts are voluntary and based completely on donations. When it comes to warloads, the response is sort of...lacking. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Don't worry guys, size doesn't matter...to lesbians ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,444 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,066 ![]() |
Yeah about the "famine" and "poverty" issues, that's the time when countries can eavesdrop, but war is kind of different. When a country is in war, no other country *cough*US*cough* should interfere unless they were asked for help. It would be a little "egotistical" if they think they can just butt in when no one even asked for help... I mean look at that war Bush started, it really brought the economy down back in the USA. Now my mom is afraid to drive the car (because she might run out of gas).
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |