Endorsements, have or not to have? |
| *mzkandi* |
 Oct 21 2005, 04:44 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest  |
We talked about this in another thread but I dont think we made an offical vote. So what is your take on the whole endorsement thing? Do you think applicants should be required to have endorsements in order to apply or just let the applicant speak for him/herself.
I now think endorsements are not needed, if an applicant is truely qualifed then that person will be able to speak him/herself through their posts (by looking over them) and what staff members and regular members have observed from them throughtout the community. |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
| *mzkandi* |
Oct 22 2005, 09:27 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
As far the committee members vote we have 6/10 decided that its not needed so, no endorsements will be required for hiring.
I dont see no point keeping this open so I'll close this. Any committee member that has something to add, feel free to reopen. Added this to approved by-laws list This post has been edited by mzkandi: Oct 22 2005, 09:30 AM |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
mzkandi Endorsements Oct 21 2005, 04:44 PM
tweeak I think they're completely useless. I've w... Oct 21 2005, 05:03 PM je like french Endorsements, at least those by official members, ... Oct 21 2005, 06:08 PM disco infiltrator Backstage, we say who we support anyway, so I don... Oct 21 2005, 07:33 PM
stephinika QUOTE(disco infiltrator @ Oct 21 2005, 5:33 P... Oct 21 2005, 11:30 PM incoherent ^
she has a point. i say we just leave it at that ... Oct 21 2005, 10:43 PM Heathasm yeah, i've been thinking about it and endorsme... Oct 21 2005, 10:59 PM racoons > you the idea was good, but it turned out no tto have e... Oct 22 2005, 06:04 AM incoherent alright, so is that everyones vote? or are we stil... Oct 22 2005, 09:24 AM xcaitlinx yeah i think endorsements are unneccessary.. Oct 22 2005, 09:25 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: