Hiring Process Discussion |
Hiring Process Discussion |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Oct 12 2005, 5:44 PM) ^ Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The most obivious issue for discussion would be hiring. So why not make a seperate thread so we can all start brain storming ideas. We can also make seperate threads for other things we would like to discuss. alright, so kiera makes a good point as quoted above. hiring is what everyone disagrees on. lets discuss what we think here. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() creepy heather ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 ![]() |
ok, aye!
![]() |
|
|
*mzkandi* |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(Heathasm @ Oct 16 2005, 4:25 PM) hahaha....cute. But I say nay.. Its a bit unlikely someone would get hired after being here for only 2 months, especially compared to candadites that have been here a bit longer, proven themselves longer, and contributed longer. Now 3- 4 months would be more significant, imo. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Oct 16 2005, 6:40 PM) hahaha....cute. But I say nay.. Its a bit unlikely someone would get hired after being here for only 2 months, especially compared to candadites that have been here a bit longer, proven themselves longer, and contributed longer. Now 3- 4 months would be more significant, imo. yes, it's unlikely someone ony here two months would get hired. it's unlikely, but possible. so why extend it longer? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |