Hiring Process Discussion |
Hiring Process Discussion |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Oct 12 2005, 5:44 PM) ^ Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The most obivious issue for discussion would be hiring. So why not make a seperate thread so we can all start brain storming ideas. We can also make seperate threads for other things we would like to discuss. alright, so kiera makes a good point as quoted above. hiring is what everyone disagrees on. lets discuss what we think here. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea.
i meant can anyone explain why an arbitrary limit is better than just letting the selection process take care of it. i know you explained stuff about dissapointments and stuff... but that's not call for a two month limit... that'd be like two weeks. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 ![]() |
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Oct 16 2005, 3:23 AM) yea. i meant can anyone explain why an arbitrary limit is better than just letting the selection process take care of it. i know you explained stuff about dissapointments and stuff... but that's not call for a two month limit... that'd be like two weeks. the two month limit would be useful, if for nothing else, keeping the applications tidy. i mean, as you said, the mods are unlikely to hire anyone who's been here for such a a short amount of time, so why have their applications getting in the way. perhaps we should have a vote. all those in favour of a two month time limit say 'aye'. all those opposed say 'nay' aye. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |