Admins |
Admins |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
Alright, so I really hate to bring them into this, but I was talking to Justin about it and he seemed to agree. Yeah, they have lives, but it seems like they go for weeks at a time without coming here. It's been almost a week for both of them. What if something important comes up? Justin made a point about having 8 admins. Yeah, it seems outrageous, but what if only 3 were active. Here's how he states it.
QUOTE have a minimum of active admins... don't have provisions for removing admins, have provisions for adding more. it doesn't matter if there are 8 admins if only 3 are active. your opinions? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Yawn ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 ![]() |
Do you guys really think it is necessary/good idea to be "lending" administrative powers to people. I mean, if the administrator is away for 3 weeks or something, then there are still the other administrator(s) there to help out. I don't think there is a need to "lend". I can understand by-laws for choosing staff members, but i think this whole administrative thing is kinda pushing it.
About being active, yes they need to be active; but remember they have lives outside of CB. i don't think there needs to be a number or a limit about how much time they spend, they are responsible enough to be promoted to that position, so i think they can manage their time wisely. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Quand j'étais jeune... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 ![]() |
Well, lending admin powers to "people" don't sound quite as right as lending powers to a head staff who is active while the admin is away.
Not that I doesn't understand the whole "lives outside of cB" thing because it has been drilled in enough, but the point is that they need to be active to know who they're choosing to be on staff. If that's not an important factor, then I don't really have a side on this topic. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Yawn ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 ![]() |
QUOTE(Spirited Away @ Oct 15 2005, 8:48 PM) Well, lending admin powers to "people" don't sound quite as right as lending powers to a head staff who is active while the admin is away. Not that I don't understand the whole "lives outside of cB" thing because it has been drilled in enough, but the point is that they need to be active to know who they're choosing to be on staff. If that's not an important factor, then there's I don't really have a side on this topic. Still, i don't like the whole "lending" powers to even head staff. That def could get messy. And are all the administrators going to be away at the same time? Yah the administrators do need to be active. i mean there is no arguement with that. But what i'm saying is, is that there is no need to make a law about it. You know? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() creepy heather ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 ![]() |
QUOTE(KissMe2408 @ Oct 15 2005, 8:53 PM) Yah the administrators do need to be active. i mean there is no arguement with that. But what i'm saying is, is that there is no need to make a law about it. You know? at this current point at time...looking at the activeness of the admins, yes. every one needs a bit of strictness. like i said..if they are going to be the administrators on a forum then they can be active at least once in a twoo weeks passing period from the last time they were on |
|
|
![]() ![]() |