Warnings and bannings, the process of |
Warnings and bannings, the process of |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
we probbaly need a bylaw about warnings and bannings, and the protocol for it.
we'd want to leave flexibility in the text tho. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Quand j'étais jeune... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 ![]() |
There shouldn't be any protocol to verbal warnings. I know a few of you are against the saying that "mods can do it", but if there are things that should be left to the judgement of the moderator, verbal warnings are it. If we're to have restrictions on making sound judgements on such a simple thing, then there is no point in having mods. Even if someone is new to cB and make a couple of mistakes in double posting or cross posting topics, verbal warnings would be a good way to ensure newcomers will read the guidelines and abide or face the consequences. Seriously, verbal warnings are meant to be flexible. They are flexible by definition because the member has done something wrong but doesn't get punished for it and walk away with a "tsk-tsk, no-no".
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |