Warnings and bannings, the process of |
Warnings and bannings, the process of |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
we probbaly need a bylaw about warnings and bannings, and the protocol for it.
we'd want to leave flexibility in the text tho. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() creepy heather ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 ![]() |
i dont like the flexibility either. verbal warning probalby should come into play in some cases...but there are obvious thigns that people do that should require suspension...or warning..like when the spam parades happened. there is really no need to be flexible...just give out a verbal warning when the person knew know better or it was misdameanor.
QUOTE is there anyway to make it so that the only thing a new member can see is the rules and then after posting in that section (like hide a word that they are supposed to find and post, but make the section so mods have to approve them so they cant just write what someone else what) and then after that they are able to see the forums. i know some sites you have to post so much to see a certain section...maybe that can be a way for people to actually read them? also, dont make the word noticable. there probably is....but that isn't a good idea. too much work for mods (because cb gets ALOT of new members everyday) it'd be difficult because people come to cb for codes and skins...im not sure there would be a way to make the site like that for new people if it didnt apply to people that weren't even signed up either eh, im just not sure there is a way to force people to read the rules like that iether lol theyd find a way around it |
|
|
![]() ![]() |