Warnings and bannings, the process of |
Warnings and bannings, the process of |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
we probbaly need a bylaw about warnings and bannings, and the protocol for it.
we'd want to leave flexibility in the text tho. |
|
|
![]() |
*tweeak* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
What we absolutely cannot have is a system where you get a warning/suspension for breaking a rule that was covered in the guildelines that you accept in order to join to begin with and then leave us the right to change them without notice or even informing anyone there's a new rule, because that's bullshit. People don't read them when joining anyway, so that's where the verbal warnings come in, but if they do accept them and then we change them and don't tell them, then they're not what people accepted and can't be used as an excuse. I've been through that- it's bullshit. I should have won my MBP battle, but they changed the rules so that they could suspend me even if I just tried to defend myself, and then they held me accountable for those changed rules they didn't tell me about and insisted that i had accepted the guidlelines and should have read them to begin with. Ok, well, Iit's hard to know something will be a problem before it becomes one, and it's even harder to object to something when they make it up just to spite you. That was not fair and while we should be for a loose interpretation of our "consitution," we cannot have such an unjust rule on "amendments."
Ok, well, I don't know what that had to do with anything. I swear i had a point to begin with... |
|
|
![]() ![]() |