Warnings and bannings, the process of |
Warnings and bannings, the process of |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
we probbaly need a bylaw about warnings and bannings, and the protocol for it.
we'd want to leave flexibility in the text tho. |
|
|
![]() |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
alright its over. ive stated my point. it just seems like youre trying to start something by sayings its not clear, yadda, yadda, yadda. okay, so its not clear. im leaving it. it makes perfect sense to me. here, ill put it all in one post and edit it all togehter.
QUOTE well banning should have a detailed reasoning behind it and if possible, see if another mod agrees. SUSPENSION!!!!!: if someone is being bad enough to SUSPEND!!!!!!, it should at least be for a week and no less. if they are doing something so "harmful" as to go straight to SUSPENSION!!!!, you shouldnt take it lightly. warnings: 2 or more wrong doings in one day. dont let the whole im sorry i didnt know work...theyre just saying that. there ya go. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |