Hiring Process Discussion |
Hiring Process Discussion |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Oct 12 2005, 5:44 PM) ^ Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The most obivious issue for discussion would be hiring. So why not make a seperate thread so we can all start brain storming ideas. We can also make seperate threads for other things we would like to discuss. alright, so kiera makes a good point as quoted above. hiring is what everyone disagrees on. lets discuss what we think here. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
hiring process, people.
make another thread for closing topics. although i think just a provision to create a rule will do in the by-laws. hiring process. why no emulate the original constitution's idea? everyone gets to vote for delegates, who in turn have a 4 days to argue about the new mods (2 days public, then 2 days of private deliberations), then they vote on each individual applicant. applicants recieving a 2/3 positive votes make it to the shortlist, which is made public. the shortlist is then sent to a group of mods, who have 2 days to see if there's a reason each of the applicants on the short list cannot be a mod. they then vote, and anyone with a majority in favor becomes a new mod. something like that. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |