Hiring Process Discussion Options

[*incoherent*]

^ Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The most obivious issue for discussion would be hiring. So why not make a seperate thread so we can all start brain storming ideas. We can also make seperate threads for other things we would like to discuss.

alright, so kiera makes a good point as quoted above. hiring is what everyone disagrees on. lets discuss what we think here.

[*disco infiltrator*]

In the last one, it was said that Jusun went off a topic that was made for mods to post who they thought would be the best. I don't know how the counting went about, perhaps it was skewed, who knows. But that's what was done this time. Not too many Admin/Headstaffs even participated in the voting and whatnot because they weren't on.

Which comes to my next point:

I think mods & members should have more involvement in the modding process, not because they need more say or whatever, but because the Admins and Heads have other things to worry about and are more involved in the actual running of the site, rather than interacting with members. Thus, they don't know the people who apply as well as the other mods and members. Mods have concentrated focus on one part of the entire forum therefore eliminating the concern for the forum as a whole. Members don't even have concentration on anything. Alas, mods and members know those who apply better than Admins and Heads. To get a real feel of the potential of your applicants, you need to interact with them a fair amount.

I don't know if it's necessarily true, but due to what I heard about the last modding process, that's what I got from it since several Admins & Heads didn't even participate due to not being here for it.