Hiring Process Discussion Options

[*incoherent*]

^ Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The most obivious issue for discussion would be hiring. So why not make a seperate thread so we can all start brain storming ideas. We can also make seperate threads for other things we would like to discuss.

alright, so kiera makes a good point as quoted above. hiring is what everyone disagrees on. lets discuss what we think here.

[*mzkandi*]

The way we choose mods this last hiring was by a vote. We put who we thought was the most qualified applicant and why.

The last hiring was done between head staff and admins. There was reject list, neutral list, and accept list. If you were on the accept or neutral list you became a mod. For example, if one mod put a member on one list as neutral and other staff put the same member on his reject list, he member wouldnt not become a mod. I remember Roxy saying something about. I was not a mod at that time though so there may be be more details I'm missing.

You're right about the declining part, but a applicant doesn't necessarily have to be on all 3 of our "accept" lists to be chosen. There is also a "neutral" list. As long as the member is not in any 3 of our "decline" lists, then they are eligible to become a mod. I may have said too much. I'm not sure if we're allowed to discuss the process with the regular members, but eh, you started it.