Bush's new Supreme Court nominee, heh. |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
| *xcaitlinx* |
 Oct 8 2005, 10:54 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guest  |
As you all probably already know, Bush nominated Harriet Miers, who has no judicial experience whatsoever to the Supreme Court.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051003/ap_on_..._wh/bush_scotus Discuss. I know that there's a lot to talk about... |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
| *RiC3xBoy* |
Oct 8 2005, 11:35 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guest |
"Might as well put a baby on the surpreme court, at least the baby will have an opinion on abortion" - Carlos Mencia
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2005, 03:45 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 i lost weight with Mulder!  Group: Official Designer Posts: 4,070 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 79,019 |
QUOTE(RiC3xBoy @ Oct 8 2005, 11:35 PM) "Might as well put a baby on the surpreme court, at least the baby will have an opinion on abortion" - Carlos Mencia  haha.  *falls over laughing*but seriously. omg. i would rather have john roberts. maybe hes just trying to appease everyone by picking a woman. but geez...there are better women. just to make this clear, im a liberal. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
xcaitlinx Bush's new Supreme Court nominee Oct 8 2005, 10:54 PM
yummy_delight Cronyism. Cronyism. Cronyism.
But aside from nom... Oct 9 2005, 09:22 PM xcaitlinx QUOTE(yummy_delight @ Oct 9 2005, 9:22 PM)Cro... Oct 12 2005, 10:32 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: