the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) Options

[sadolakced acid]

yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.

a thread to comment about the new staff selection.

(ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread)
i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing.

right. now on to the main part.

were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected?


i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know...

[micron]

hey guys,
good to see that everyone's so passionate about this.

just so that everyone's on the same page, let me remind you (those who are part of the commitee) that this is going to be a lot of work and responsibilty. the best type of persons for drafting bylaws are people who are detail oriented, highly analytical, keen on hindsight and foresight, and dont mind getting their hands dirty.

if you are all of the above, then im sure youre going to enjoy this. otherwise, i would recommend that you widthdraw from the commitee now.

if executed properly, youll be making cb history. so act accordingly. =)

ill leave this open for another day for people to reconsider and if there are others who might be interested in joining the commitee. if youre a member and wish to be part of the commitee, dont mind that its already full. speak up, everyone will have their proper cosideration. likewise for staff members. and it doesnt matter if youre coming in with 10 posts, your post counts are insignificant here. just explain to us why you should be part of the comittee, and we'll give you proper consideration.