the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) Options

[sadolakced acid]

yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.

a thread to comment about the new staff selection.

(ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread)
i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing.

right. now on to the main part.

were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected?


i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know...

[racoons > you]

^

well, to be fair, we need to hear from justin and katt.

and also, jusun has to approve them. i hav eno say over the staff delegates. calm down, this will take a litle while to get fully rolling

also, in terms of equality, i think that its important that we say from early on that we arent going into this as 'mods vs. members', if we take votes on issues, each person is free to vote as they see fit, based on the points put forth by delegate and non-delegates.

we are two teams palying soccer or anything, we represent the people

[Paradox of Life]

well, to be fair, we need to hear from justin and katt.

I don't really think I have a place in here, but yes, I was surprised at who was chosen to be in the people staff. People debating about this really has no effect because it's pressuring the mods and stirring up more drama and obviously we have way too much of that already.