the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) Options

[sadolakced acid]

yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.

a thread to comment about the new staff selection.

(ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread)
i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing.

right. now on to the main part.

were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected?


i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know...

[micron]

hi there,
this time around, i chose the new staff members based on the number of times they appeared on the old staff's new staff list. heh, what a mouthful. as someone mentioned, there were so many qualified candidates but only so many spots available.

if you're concerned about transparancy, which is a very good thing for cb, i recommend you start a petition to create the bylaws for createblog. that way, everyone will know exactly what and how every process works.

[BrokenDream]

i chose the new staff members based on the number of times they appeared on the old staff's new staff list.

Okay, wait a minute. Do you mean people that submitted an application LAST time? I don't think that should matter. I have worked very, very hard to get the requirements, and I was not submitting a application last time because I didn't have the requirements. It should matter on how friendly, helpful, and respectful they are to other members and the community. Sure, this was my first attempt to try to be on the staff, and I didn't make it.. not that I'm mad, or such. Just a question.