the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.
a thread to comment about the new staff selection. (ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread) i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing. right. now on to the main part. were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected? i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know... |
|
|
![]() |
*kryogenix* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
![]() Chill out people. It's an internet message board. It's hard for moderators not to be conservative when it comes to the rules. Obviously, we have to, since we are charged with enforcing them. But that doesn't mean we're not open to ideas. There is no need for bickering here. There's a feedback forum. You guys post ideas, we look at them and decide which ones will improve CB. However, like it or not, this isn't a democracy. Admins usually call the shots, but ultimately, it's micron's decision for the bigger things. Like it or not, the admin's word is law. You guys should consider yourself lucky just to have a benevolent guy like micron as the owner. So how about it guys, no more drama. Talk like grown ups, ok? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |