the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.
a thread to comment about the new staff selection. (ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread) i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing. right. now on to the main part. were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected? i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know... |
|
|
![]() |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
^thats true, but then only staff can close it and not the regular members.
i just say we use invisionfree entitling everyone of equal power so if staff members arent on, it can be dealt with as necessary. is there anyway the 5 staff members joining the commitee can become assembled asap so we can get this rolling, thus getting it done faster and ending the chaos? i think (unless james objects) that kiera and nicki have already volunteered meaning well need 3 more. any takers? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |