the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.
a thread to comment about the new staff selection. (ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread) i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing. right. now on to the main part. were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected? i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know... |
|
|
![]() |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
the invisionfree board is what im leaning towards, but remember, there are 5 mods that will be on the commitee. yes, it's in feedback, but someone suggested a head staff person as well. they will be able to do as we need. maybe frankie?
with that being said, i still say we use the invisionfree board because we can all be granted with access to do as we please and get rid of wasteful things. it also keeps cB uncluttered and its just amongst us to keep it organized rather than people not taking part. delegates is fine. it's just a word. is there anyway the 5 staff members joining the commitee can become assembled asap so we can get this rolling, thus getting it done faster? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |