the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.
a thread to comment about the new staff selection. (ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread) i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing. right. now on to the main part. were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected? i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know... |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 ![]() |
oh, good!
then i agree. although if we try and have mass input, say in one thread its going to be messy, lots of distracting arguments, repetiotion etc. how about we assign a committee, say, 5 members, 5 staff, probably including at least one headstaff, who can deal with it on an invision board |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() cb's #1 fan! =) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advisor Posts: 2,342 Joined: Nov 2003 Member No: 1 ![]() |
QUOTE(racoons > you @ Oct 6 2005, 4:09 PM) how about we assign a committee, say, 5 members, 5 staff, probably including at least one headstaff, who can deal with it on an invision board sounds good to me. ill let you and sadolakced acid appoint the 5 members, since you two seem to be more inclined than most in cb politics. you may appoint yourselves. ill see who from the staff team wishes to participate and come up with the five staff. we'll need a temporary subforum during the creation of the bylaws. one pinned topic with the most current working copy of the bylaws. and the forum open to everyone for input and discussion. the process will be completely transparant, anyone can bring up anything they want to see in the bylaws. the committee will have to come to a consensus in what to include and what to leave out. they will be the ones that will do the actual writing of the working copy of the bylaws. the bylaws should include how it will be approved, terminated, ammendments (vote by community? staff? etc). lets make this thorough please. ill check back tonight. im the meantime, google is our friend. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |