the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.
a thread to comment about the new staff selection. (ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread) i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing. right. now on to the main part. were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected? i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know... |
|
|
![]() |
*incoherent* |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Guest ![]() |
jusun, are you meaning that you picked the staff based on the current staff's picks? that confused me how you worded it.
anyways, as many were, i was surprised michael didnt get it. ah well. its done and over with. nothing we can do now. it seems as though the girls really out number the guys though. i think there are 4? guys on the whole staff (not counting jusun). maybe its just that girls are better. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |