the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.
a thread to comment about the new staff selection. (ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread) i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing. right. now on to the main part. were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected? i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know... |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea, i'm not saying the people selected will be bad mods, because i think it would take a monkey on a power trip to be a bad mod (but that's my opinion of a bad mod, which is one who deletes and closes random threads, IP bans you for saying helll, etc. )
i think they'll do a fine job, but i wasn't exactly expecting them... what are the factors that are used to judge mod applicants anyways? it's not the app, so is it likablility? signature? following of rules? general attitude? opinions of the public? EDIT yea this is probably going to turn into a complaint about how we don't know how mods are selected, and i'll draw criticism from the staff because "you don't need to know" and " you're just stirring up trouble", but if it does, feel free to move to feedback. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |