the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
the increasingly inaptly named cB rev 2.0, (By- laws or something like it) |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yea. no changes, no complaints. so this should not be in feedback.
a thread to comment about the new staff selection. (ok so this is a complaint, this part, but it's not the main part of the thread) i for one don't like the practice of deleting applications after the new staffers are announced. i think some of us would like to be able to see who's application was better. of course, it could open up the selection people to criticism (if people think the application sucked), but sometime public criticism is a good thing. right. now on to the main part. were you suprised at any of the selections, or who wasn't selected? i was quite expecting michael to be people staff. maybe his app sucked, the world will never know... |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Shove it ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 496 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,641 ![]() |
I, for one, was very happy to see the people who were selected as mods get selected. Yes, there were some people that weren't chosen that would have made great mods as well but like it was already stated many times previously, there were only a limited amount of spots open. I think that those hired were hired for a reason and will do a wonderful job. As far as the applications go, not only do I think that they were considered when deciding which canidates to select for the posistions, but it also gave an opportunity for those applying to show some effort and dedication. I am very pleased. Congratulations and good luck to the new mods
![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |