brands that are overrated/underrated |
brands that are overrated/underrated |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Peggy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,508 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 214,025 ![]() |
List some brands that are overrated.
Name some that are underrated too. The only one I can think of for overrated is Hollister, the price and the quality (I mean the style and the frabric quality) don't balance. The price is too expensive, and most shirts are really thin (not the ones for layering), also some styles are really ugly. However, there are some good clothes from Hollister. For underrated, I can't think of any right now. Edit: I searched but can't find any matching results. This post has been edited by peggysturr: Oct 1 2005, 07:18 PM |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 51 Joined: Sep 2005 Member No: 227,995 ![]() |
Lacoste is VERY OVERRATED. the price is ridiculous. i remember [well my mom remembers] when she had like 468466488364 lacoste polos... they used to sell for like $15 [or so] Pumas are overrated too. everyone suddenly wants a pair. ive liked them for a while now, and must admit their designs are awesome, but they dont last. my mostros are destroyed. they almost look like my abercrombie jeans. [extremely ripped] and i bought them in june. In constrast, my gucci loafers [which i got in CHRISTMAS] look brand new... and im always wearing them... converse ...UGH... wtf, now they are almost $40 and used to be for $10 and no one would buy them, except emo/rocker guys. i hope im not giving off the impression that im cheap, cause trust me, im not. Im the furthest thing from it, but im not an airheaded baffoon [only sometimes] .. sure i`ll pay $200 for a pair of sunglasses and $300 for a pair of loafers or shoes. but $80 for a crappy polo... no thanks. i pay the money when its worth it burberry makes better ones for a bit more. [polo is cheaper too and better] |
|
|
![]() ![]() |