Jesus... gay?? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Jesus... gay?? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() M.a. x. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,913 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 148,641 ![]() |
Well was he? There appears to be nothing in the bible to suggest otherwise. I ask this as a serious question as it would throw so much light on current issues and debates about homosexuality.
This is in no way intended to offended Christians...it is a serious search for some truth. There is certainly nothing I can see in the bible that indicates that he was Heterosexual and homosexuality was widely practised at the time. It also interest me that of the twelve chosen to be his disciples they were all men. Maybe someone can put me right on some biblical knowledge. But I cannot find a single passage where he sees women as 'desireable' and yet he is always on the lookout for men 'A fisher of men'. Your thoughts would be appreciated. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
two things.
paragraphs propoganda. you say jesus is pure, holy, etc. support it with somethign other than the bible. |
|
|
*mipadi* |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Guest ![]() |
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Sep 29 2005, 9:57 PM) In all fairness, that's a bit hard to do; Jesus isn't mentioned in great detail many other places other than the Bible--or, at least, not in places that don't also reference the Bible to support their claims. The question can also be raised that, since Christianity is based on the Bible, what's the point of even referencing something other than the Bible? Christians don't require the Bible to be supported, so it doesn't really matter that much whether claims are supported elsewhere or not; the religion is based on a single book, the Bible. I'm not saying it makes a lot of sense or is a good argument necessarily; I'm just playing Devil's advocate for a second. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |