Toshiba develops new, power source of mp3 |
Toshiba develops new, power source of mp3 |
Sep 16 2005, 10:15 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Wow, i dont know whats going on... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,439 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 10,977 |
Toshiba's is testing their methanol fuel cell that will power their mp3 players. So far, a couple of squirts will last your player for up to 60 hours. It's a sort of good idea, but its just so inconvinent, carrying that thing around. Of course with a 60 hours battery life, you wouldn't have to bring it around everywhere that much> unless you travel.
QUOTE Toshiba has announced their development of a compact methanol fuel cell capable of powering a digital music player for up to 60 hours on a single charge. About the same as a pack of gum, 100mW and 300mW models of the fuel cell prototype run on single charges of 3.5ml and 10ml of concentrated methanol respectively. Toshiba claims the cells are able to power a HDD-based digital music player for 35 hours, for the smaller cell, and 60 hours for the larger one - an impressive gain over conventional batteries used in today's portable electronics. Two players running off the fuel cell prototypes, and their methanol cartridges, will get their public debut at CEATEC JAPAN 2005.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 19 2005, 06:05 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,316 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 37,142 |
why would they use this for an mp3 ? shouldnt they use this for like a car or a segway or something that is used for transportation.
|
|
|
|
uLoVeMikeRoch Toshiba develops new Sep 16 2005, 10:15 PM
RiC3xBoy It is a bit bigger, but a 60 hour battery life is ... Sep 16 2005, 10:21 PM
uLoVeMikeRoch QUOTE(RiC3xBoy @ Sep 16 2005, 10:21 PM)It is ... Sep 16 2005, 10:27 PM
pandamonium i dont get it, do they squirt it at the battery? Sep 17 2005, 03:11 PM
uLoVeMikeRoch QUOTE(pandamonium @ Sep 17 2005, 3:11 PM)i do... Sep 18 2005, 11:44 PM
ThunderEvermore QUOTE(uLoVeMikeRoch @ Sep 19 2005, 12:44 AM)T... Sep 19 2005, 12:01 AM
uLoVeMikeRoch QUOTE(pandamonium @ Sep 19 2005, 6:05 PM)why ... Sep 22 2005, 07:20 PM![]() ![]() |