is bush at fault? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
is bush at fault? |
*tweeak* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
to begin with, i'd like to point out that I do not support Bush. However, I cannot understand why people are blaming him for Katrina, just because he has troops in Iraq. It seems like a lame excuse to protest the war and find a scapegoat for the hurricane
so, do you think Bush is at fault for part of the Katrina ordeal? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
QUOTE(sprinkle-the-stars @ Sep 2 2005, 9:38 PM) well, when hurricane andrew hit, it was quite like this, and thursday morning they knew by nightfall it would be complete anarchy, every person for them selves, whoever has the biggest gun wins. so that morning they had a press conferece saying "we're going to lose control of the area by nightfall, and there will be many, many more casualties." in one hour 20000 some (not completely sure about the number, but it was a lot, and i think i twas 20000, just not sure.) troops were already deployed, with equipement, and by night they were serving hot meal dinners. i mean, sure there are nat. guard troops home, but they're not all close to the disaster area, a lot of equipment like half ton trucks and humvees are in iraq, a lot of troops are on home leave after an iraqi tour, and thus aren't really prepared to be called up. in fact, i think the only nat. guard that has been sent was guardsmen due to be shipped out to iraq. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() show me a garden thats bursting to life ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 ![]() |
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Sep 2 2005, 10:12 PM) well, when hurricane andrew hit, it was quite like this, and thursday morning they knew by nightfall it would be complete anarchy, every person for them selves, whoever has the biggest gun wins. so that morning they had a press conferece saying "we're going to lose control of the area by nightfall, and there will be many, many more casualties." in one hour 20000 some (not completely sure about the number, but it was a lot, and i think i twas 20000, just not sure.) troops were already deployed, with equipement, and by night they were serving hot meal dinners. i mean, sure there are nat. guard troops home, but they're not all close to the disaster area, a lot of equipment like half ton trucks and humvees are in iraq, a lot of troops are on home leave after an iraqi tour, and thus aren't really prepared to be called up. in fact, i think the only nat. guard that has been sent was guardsmen due to be shipped out to iraq. Huh. Did not know this... It would definately speed things up a bit. caytexo- your last post...well..it made you seem somewhat arrogant...but eh -shrug- |
|
|
*xcaitlinx* |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |