Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

Polygamy..., Religious fundamentalism
madchenallein
post Jun 26 2005, 06:17 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 58
Joined: May 2005
Member No: 139,806



Okay, so I just finished Krakauer's Under the Banner of Heaven, and it raises so many interesting questions. In it he states that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints does not consider itself to have fundamentalist splinters. That having been said, for simplicity's sake, Krakauer refers to many of the religious groups mentioned in his book, which have in fact splintered off from the LDS church after excommunication, as Mormon or LDS fundamentalists.

Here's the debate: do you consider the practice of polygamy under religious tenets to be constitutionally protected, or is it simply a violation of law? According to one fundamental 'Mormon' teching cited in the book, a dedicated follower must practice multiple 'celestial marriages' (several wives), not for his sexual delectation, but to shore up resources for his afterlife. The guidelines are that he spend equal time with each wife, abstain from sex unless it is specifically to create life with a fertile (read 'ovulating') wife-not exactly a license to disport himself with four women at once.

I am not Mormon or fundamentalist Mormon, however, I must question the government interfering in the practice of one's religious faith in the home. However, to contradict myself (lol), many of the women in these relationships can feel abused or devalued and some children surely are taken advantage of or forced into relationships they are not yet ready for.

Problems that also figure into the actual practice of polygamy is the severe abuse by some (many) fundamental polygamists of the American welfare system. But, for me, that is turning into a slippery slope, as I already oppose government subsidized welfare, so let's look at it strictly as a state vs. religion issue.

If you oppose it, then at what point do you stop opposing government interfering in religious practice? How about not getting a social security number because you oppose the government's intrusiveness and imperialism under the guise of 'fill in your SSN' religiously? Or what if you don't want your tax money to be used for state schools because your faith teaches differently from what the government indoctrinates the state school children with using your money? wacko.gif
 
 
Start new topic
Replies
crocodilo
post Aug 29 2005, 11:42 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 118,674



In some societies polygamy has it's place and is justifiable such as the north American Indians who were warrior peoples. Due to tribal hostilities the male warriors were often killed in large numbers leaving the tribes female population severely outwaying the tribes male population. Therefore, polygamy was required so that all the women could be cared for by a man and so more women could be impregnated in order to ensure the continuation of the tribes existance by maintaining a large population

This shows in certain societies polygamy is justifiable

Just like the Mormons, the Native American Indians were forced to abolish their views on polygamy due to thy interventionof the state which is not fair
 
sadolakced acid
post Aug 29 2005, 07:37 PM
Post #3


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929



QUOTE(crocodilo @ Aug 29 2005, 11:42 AM)
Just like the Mormons, the Native American Indians were forced to abolish their views on polygamy due to thy interventionof the state which is not fair
*



but the males weren't being killed off anymore.
 

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: