Room for Improvement |
Room for Improvement |
Aug 28 2005, 10:54 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
cb=bullshit. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,783 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,793 |
here's one way to "improve the community"...
Don't suspend/ban members for creating spam topics... it just gives them more of a reason to spam and bitch about createblog. For example, when they get unsuspended... they'll just come back and continue to spam . Also, there is a createblog chat room that these 'banned/suspended spammers' go into daily and talk about how much createblog sucks. Now, let's say a newbie comes into that chatroom... Word spreads... and createblog's reputation then goes from great source for blogging needs to... uptight community. --P.S. I'm completely serious about this topic. By the way, one swift kick towards the crotch will surely stop them. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 28 2005, 11:16 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() You'll find me in your dreams. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 8,536 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 114,010 |
Did I mention they're IP-banned? They can't come back.
And we don't want spam because is stupid, and against the rules. [ http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=970 ] It clutters the boards, makes everything load slower, and annoys people. It's bad. |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2005, 10:06 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() WarPath Leader. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 668 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 216,721 |
QUOTE(nyah-nek0 @ Aug 29 2005, 6:16 AM) LoL! yeah you ban 1 IP Address,what about the other 254 IP Addresses?can or can't be used? what about proxy's ? what about IP Tunnels? what about 2342884 Anonimity softs,like anonymiser?or whateva?,the only way to see if what you are saying,works for sure,ban yourself,then change your IP Address,and try login again. PS:How can you make the difference? how you know if you banned his proxy and not his realy IP Address,easy Q,lets see the answers. PS2:When 1 user doesnt obey the rulles,lets say 3 times,dont do the same mistake and ban "his/her IP Address" , i know you can do`it like 123.123.123.*,so even he is using a proxy,IP Tunnels,or anything else,it will be more easy to ban him like that,then to ban 1by1 each IP Addresses.(AND HE CANT COME BACK FOR SURE,UNTILL HE/SHE GETS ANOTHER IP ADDRESS RANGE CLASS;) PS3:Or more easy,and less time,if you have in your admin panel,like on usual phpBB forums,the option "Disallow names/usernames",that will help for sure,only with 1-2clicks. Thank You Enjoy. |
|
|
|
| *mipadi* |
Aug 29 2005, 02:27 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Claudel @ Aug 29 2005, 11:06 AM) LoL! yeah you ban 1 IP Address,what about the other 254 IP Addresses?can or can't be used? what about proxy's ? what about IP Tunnels? what about 2342884 Anonimity softs,like anonymiser?or whateva?,the only way to see if what you are saying,works for sure,ban yourself,then change your IP Address,and try login again. There's a point at which most pro-active attempts at IP banning will suffice. Say a user gets banned by IP. Sure, he might reset his dialup connection and get a new IP, or he might connect through a proxy. So you ban him again. Maybe he'll get a new IP and spam again. So you ban that. Eventually it's just going to be a waste of time for him, and he'll stop because it's too much effort. People don't spam because of a strong desire to cause trouble; they spam because it's a relatively easy prank. As soon as you make it difficult, the spammer becomes less and less interested in the prank. |
|
|
|
omg_melface Room for Improvement Aug 28 2005, 10:54 PM
xnofearx The Sith will rule cB!
::silence:: Aug 28 2005, 10:56 PM
chaneun You mean, an eKick in the crotch Aug 28 2005, 10:56 PM
fishcake-y They're IP-banned. They can't come back.
... Aug 28 2005, 10:57 PM
chaneun ^they could close registrations, temporarily. Aug 28 2005, 10:59 PM
omg_melface I was talking about the suspended ones... that why... Aug 28 2005, 10:59 PM
disco infiltrator ^ )to chaneun) That would be ridiculous. We get at... Aug 28 2005, 11:00 PM
omg_melface HEY I GOT AN IDEA, SHUT DOWN THE FORUMS FOR ONE HO... Aug 28 2005, 11:00 PM
oxbrkntearsxo QUOTE(omg_melface @ Aug 29 2005, 12:00 AM)HEY... Aug 29 2005, 12:52 AM
xcaitlinx that's like saying that putting people in jail... Aug 28 2005, 11:01 PM
omg_melface is the spam really THAT bad? doesn't createblo... Aug 28 2005, 11:04 PM
xcaitlinx why would cB WANT spam? to be quite honest, i dont... Aug 28 2005, 11:13 PM
omg_melface I don't believe I ever said I absolutely hated... Aug 28 2005, 11:16 PM
xcaitlinx QUOTE(omg_melface @ Aug 28 2005, 11:16 PM)I d... Aug 28 2005, 11:18 PM
mzislandpinay well you knoe wut.. i think the staff and mods are... Aug 28 2005, 11:27 PM
omg_melface oh jesus christ... i'm not even going to bothe... Aug 28 2005, 11:27 PM
xcaitlinx ^ i assumed that all mods pmed the people that the... Aug 28 2005, 11:29 PM
omg_melface No... they don't. Aug 28 2005, 11:32 PM
xcaitlinx well, when you think about it, if the person inten... Aug 28 2005, 11:33 PM
omg_melface but i'm talking about warnings. Aug 28 2005, 11:50 PM
xcaitlinx well, maybe you're right about that. but that... Aug 28 2005, 11:59 PM
omg_melface yeah umm, this topic was taken a little bit too se... Aug 29 2005, 12:01 AM
Spirited Away QUOTE(omg_melface @ Aug 29 2005, 12:01 AM)yea... Aug 29 2005, 12:05 AM
omg_melface oh christ...
sarcasm + internet =... people just ... Aug 29 2005, 02:03 AM
x_angawhomps Nowadays we don't tolerate the spam topics.. e... Aug 29 2005, 02:45 AM
Spirited Away QUOTE(x_angawhomps @ Aug 29 2005, 2:45 AM)it... Aug 29 2005, 08:42 AM
racoons > you you're right... you should suspend them
you s... Aug 29 2005, 04:09 AM
Claudel that apply's only for noobs ;-)
I still think ... Aug 29 2005, 03:43 PM
x_angawhomps Since Mel made this topic as just a joke, I'm ... Aug 31 2005, 03:49 AM![]() ![]() |